Our FR10 faceplate captions followed the wrong files into the lesson

RaviBennett0737 · 2026年3月18日 04:43 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

RA
RaviBennett0737
We have judged physical faceplates and a real reject to carry into lighting comparisons. The new teaching export has still managed to put the reject caption under an accepted plate's bright band. I caught it because I recognised the hole pattern. I want to repair the links before anyone treats this as a new threshold problem.

18 条回复

CA
CallumChan1056

We lost the orientation clue when a weld photograph was cropped. Keep the full views while you repair this. A familiar bright streak is a poor way for a tutor to identify which part a caption belongs to.

4分
RA
RaviBennett0737

The full view is what gave it away. Both original files have the right part identity. The mistake is in the page assembled from them, not quality's physical decisions.

19分
SA
SarahBarnes0589

Check the whole export, not only that page. Were the files and captions sorted separately? That could put several valid captions against the wrong images.

14分
ZA
ZaraAllen0308

And keep the source set unchanged while you check. Don't relabel an accepted faceplate just to make it agree with the page.

2分
LU
LucaBarnes0526

Sarah's question is worth following because each row can look perfectly reasonable on its own, especially when the caption only says scratch near edge.

10分
RA
RaviBennett0737

Author found that exact mistake. Image names were sorted after the captions had been copied into a separate column. They are rebuilding the page from the identity-linked source entries. Old export withdrawn.

12分
CA
CallumChan1056

Good. Keep an orientation feature in each detail as well as the full view. That helped you catch this one; the next tutor may not know every hole pattern by heart.

0分
ZA
ZaraAllen0308

Ravi, are there specially prepared demo plates mixed into the source set? Ours had buffed samples among untouched production finish. Correct filenames didn't make them comparable.

7分
RA
RaviBennett0737

No buffed demo samples in this set, Zara. Both finishes and the normal preparation are identified with quality's decisions. Callum, the new details keep the nearby holes visible.

7分
SA
SarahBarnes0589

Have the author try the sort again as a check. The caption should travel with the image identity, not depend on everyone remembering to leave the rows alone.

20分
LU
LucaBarnes0526

And can the tutor find the real rejected faceplate from that page without you helping, Ravi? That seems a useful end-to-end check.

13分
RA
RaviBennett0737

Reordering the source entries now leaves each caption linked to its file and part. The tutor check is next. We have not touched the lighting settings to make this page error disappear.

8分
CA
CallumChan1056

The tutor should compare the exported copy, not the editor view. That is where your first mismatch reached the lesson.

2分
ZA
ZaraAllen0308

Printed copy too, if that's what they use at the bench. A corrected folder can be surprisingly far away from the actual lesson.

14分
SA
SarahBarnes0589

Also check the full-view link survives export. A caption can be right while the linked detail opens another part.

2分
RA
RaviBennett0737

Tutor found the correct accepted and rejected plates from the exported page and its full views. The printed replacement matches. One old handout was still in the bench folder; removed now.

11分
RA
RaviBennett0737

Thanks, Sarah, the separate-sort question found the cause quickly. Reference export repaired and checked. The station lighting comparison continues with the same physical samples and their original quality decisions.

16分
LU
LucaBarnes0526

Nice to fix the page without asking the poor accepted faceplate to become defective for consistency.

12分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .