Who deals with an item whose identity or disposition is uncertain? The report needs a visible review queue, not a rule that chooses the latest reassuring result.

Quality owns disposition. The current report is adding completed attempts, not distinct accepted identities. We have enough labelled records to recalculate; I will test on copies before replacing the displayed total.

Include an accepted result later placed on hold in those tests. Latest success alone does not necessarily equal current acceptance.

And show attempts separately on screen, clearly named. People may still want to see the retry workload; correcting progress should not make that effort disappear because it is no longer the headline number.

The copied-record reconciliation gives 204 accepted housings, 16 held for quality review and 8 not yet inspected: 228 distinct items. The old progress total included retries. Failed attempts remain linked in the detailed view.

Did rebuilding twice and replaying the retained attempt leave those counts unchanged? That checks the restart behaviour which exposed the problem.

Yes. Rebuild twice, duplicate-attempt replay and fail-then-reviewed-retry cases give the same item totals. Quality signed off the disposition interpretation. The dashboard now shows 204 accepted of 228, with holds and uninspected items separate. The counting defect is fixed; the batch is not finished.

Thanks, Emma. That separate 16 and 8 will help the supervisor decide what work remains instead of treating every nonaccepted housing as another inspection to start.