I'm helping put together reference images for a UR5e-presented trim plate and our 'deep scratch' moves sideways when we move the lamp, so before somebody tunes a threshold around it, how do I get the actual marked parts and their pictures tied together properly?
How do I stop us labelling the lamp as a scratch?
LinAdams0096 · 2025年5月27日 14:56 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
5 条回复
回复 LinAdams0096
Give each physical plate an ID. Have whoever owns cosmetic acceptance mark the defect location on a separate sketch, then photograph the same plate under the proposed setup. Keep the borderline ones too
6分Cheers, the separate sketch is the missing bit; I've been trying to point at glare in a photograph to explain why the photograph is misleading.
20分回复 LinAdams0096
Any physical check on the plate called deeply scratched? Moving glare can sit over a real mark. Would not relabel that one from the lamp experiment alone
11分There is a small nick near the edge, nothing where the long streak was labelled; quality has kept the nick as the defect and we've retired that particular long-streak label, not the whole plate.
11分回复 LinAdams0096
Did the revised lighting still show the nick after removing and reseating the plate? That's where I'd want the next image set, before spending time on thresholds
6分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .