I'm sorting the handover requirements for an FR10 welding proposal. Old sheets show the gusseted bracket held against the jig stops, then accepted after correction. No loose-part reading in between. I can't decide which checks the new route needs from that alone.
Ask whether the final tick was recorded before or after the correction for each batch. The sequence on the form may not be the sequence people followed.
I would find the actual checking instruction next. A tick against the jig stops may only confirm fit-up. It may never have been intended to describe the finished bracket angle.
Bruno, do the sheets identify individual brackets? We had clamped and corrected figures sharing a batch folder without being traceable to the same pieces.
Then do not pair the old readings as if each row follows one part. They can still describe the old process without giving you a measured before-and-after change.
Found instruction J3. It checks contact at the jig stops before welding; final drawing F checks the released angle from datum A. So the two ticks were never the same check.
Its fixture number matches the plate, and the support arrangement matches the toolroom drawing. Quality has confirmed that link. The old correction method is still not described.
Yes, quality will own that disposition. We've asked welding and quality for a current-part comparison with the released reading taken before any correction, and the estimate keeps an allowance meanwhile.