Can't define the FR10 bracket route from these final ticks

Inspector says after correction on the batches she signed. We've kept her account with those specific sheets, not assumed it covers every old batch.

That helps. Is the correction time in the current estimate?

Correction time is blank, Harish Abbott. I've flagged that to the estimator. Toolroom is looking for the checking instruction Elliot mentioned.

Only batch numbers, Harish Chen. Quality owns final acceptance, Maya, but the proposal hasn't separated that from the fixture check yet.

Then do not pair the old readings as if each row follows one part. They can still describe the old process without giving you a measured before-and-after change.

A provisional cost allowance would be more honest than leaving the correction blank. It can change when the trial answers the question.

Found instruction J3. It checks contact at the jig stops before welding; final drawing F checks the released angle from datum A. So the two ticks were never the same check.

Useful find. Does J3 actually belong to this fixture, or did it just turn up in the folder?

Its fixture number matches the plate, and the support arrangement matches the toolroom drawing. Quality has confirmed that link. The old correction method is still not described.

Will the new handover identify where an out-of-tolerance released bracket goes?

Yes, quality will own that disposition. We've asked welding and quality for a current-part comparison with the released reading taken before any correction, and the estimate keeps an allowance meanwhile.

Please post the comparison when it is available. I would like to know how much of that allowance survives once the process is defined.