Which cover owns the scratch label in this FR5 folder?

AnilAli0201 · 2025年10月18日 04:37 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

AN
AnilAli0201
Separate polished-cover job from my trim-plate question: our FR5 image folder labels a moving highlight as a scratch.

9 条回复

RA
RaviBell0650

Can you identify the physical cover behind that image?

19分
AN
AnilAli0201

Yes. Retained cover, no linked quality decision yet.

-1分
FA
FarahChan1113

Have quality judge that cover against the appearance requirement first, with its identity tied to the images; the shifting highlight can remain an observation without becoming a defect label.

20分
RA
RaviBarnes0563

Keep the eventual operator in the reference handover too, so the decision does not remain something only the person who organised the photographs understands.

11分
RA
RaviBell0650

RaviBarnes, agreed, but first we need the decision itself.

16分
AN
AnilAli0201

Quality review requested. Existing scratch label removed from the tuning set, image retained separately.

5分
FA
FarahChan1113

Use accepted and genuinely rejected covers for the later presentation comparison, including difficult normal reflections, rather than testing only whether this one bright line disappears.

22分
RA
RaviBarnes0563

Farah, that also makes the handover easier: the operator can see an accepted awkward example beside an actual reject, with the physical decision explained.

15分
RA
RaviBell0650

Anil, is the holder fixed or still being adjusted between pictures?

12分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .