简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

The FR5 steel-blank sketch has lost the door again

LiamCarter1012 · 2026年5月8日 16:13 UTC

回复讨论
LI
LiamCarter1012
I sent the door position with our steel-blank job, but the new FR5 sketch still shows a bare wrist point. Who should own the combined tool-and-machine view before we compare positions?

18 条回复

LI
LinArcher0357

The integrator should assemble that comparison, with tooling supplying the actual proposed gripper. I'd return the incomplete sketch with your door view attached. Otherwise you can spend weeks giving thoughtful feedback on an arm carrying an imaginary pencil.

7
LI
LiamCarter1012

Integrator has accepted that job. Tooling still owes the open-finger outline, so neither proposed position is ready to compare.

1
MI
MinaBell0685

Include the door handle. Our latest full model found the clash there, not against the big flat door everyone had been staring at.

9
OW
OwenChen1182

And where does the blank go after machining? I've seen a convincing entrance view hide a horrible loaded exit. Not sure which half of the job your sketch covers.

7
LI
LiamCarter1012

It's loading and unloading, Owen. The receiver sits beside the stand; I have added the loaded exit, release and empty return to the integrator's list.

5
AN
AnikaBrooks0856

Ask the setter to mark fixture-change space on that same view; a convenient receiver position can occupy exactly where the fixture has to come out.

8
LI
LinArcher0357

Mina's handle point is a useful cheap check while they're assembling the rest. You don't need a beautifully rendered whole cycle to reject a tool that occupies the handle.

5
MI
MinaBell0685

True, but Liam needs the rejected geometry retained. Otherwise a later revision can quietly put the stand back where it started.

20
LI
LiamCarter1012

Complete tool now clashes with the handle from the front position. Side position clears that route but puts the receiver in the setter's fixture-change space. Both are marked rejected as drawn.

15
OW
OwenChen1182

Could the receiver move without changing the stand, or is it fixed to something you haven't mentioned?

9
AN
AnikaBrooks0856

If it can move, include who exchanges its trays; clearing the setter by borrowing another person's working space just moves the argument.

9
LI
LiamCarter1012

Receiver is freestanding. Integrator proposes moving it farther along the bench, with the packer and setter checking their access. No other equipment needs relocating.

-2
LI
LinArcher0357

Sounds worth finishing that comparison. Is the new loaded route still using the same fingers and adapter, or did the moved receiver prompt another tool change?

10
LI
LiamCarter1012

Same assembly. The revised route fits in the combined model, and the setter accepts fixture exchange access. Packer wants the empty-tray storage included before agreeing the receiver location.

13
OW
OwenChen1182

That's a real job appearing round the arm now. What happened to the empty trays?

1
MI
MinaBell0685

Owen, that's still the packer's unanswered point, unless Liam has an update. Don't let a clear transfer view answer it on their behalf.

17
LI
LiamCarter1012

We added a tray rack within the existing bench length. Packer and setter completed the layout walkthrough, and the integration review accepted the full handling proposal. Side position chosen for the order.

14
LI
LinArcher0357

Did the rack make it into the quoted scope too? Small enough to be forgotten, apparently important enough to decide the layout.

16

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。