Why do our FR5 sleeve demos start from different jobs?

JackBaker0515 · 2026年3月6日 19:15 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

JA
JackBaker0515
The dedicated-tray candidate looks quicker than the one using our incoming tray, but I would have to add re-traying and carrier storage to get that starting condition. Both suppliers say the demonstration proves suitability. What should they repeat with our actual sleeve and fixture requirements?

13 条回复

AD
AdaCarter0999

Same incoming sleeves and receiving fixture for both?

6分
JA
JackBaker0515

Same sleeve family, not the same sample range yet. Receiving fixture also differed. I have sent the actual range and our required fixture arrangement to both.

8分
YA
YasminBarnes0528

Good place to reset the comparison. Include loading, release and withdrawal, with the preparation and operator help made explicit. A candidate can remain worth considering with changed presentation, but price that changed job honestly.

9分
ZA
ZaraChen1178

Who prepares the dedicated tray during ordinary production?

8分
YA
YasminChan1050

And who puts the empty carriers away?

19分
JA
JackBaker0515

Our operator does both, Zara and Yasmin Chan. She will observe an ordinary order with the supervisor. Neither task appeared in the initial allowance.

9分
YA
YasminBarnes0528

Include what she stops doing to prepare it. Carrier work can be quick by itself and still interrupt another job badly. Let her explain where the empty and full trays actually sit.

9分
AD
AdaCarter0999

Have both suppliers agreed to the same receiving arrangement?

1分
JA
JackBaker0515

They have. Dedicated-tray supplier's first complete drawing clashes with our fixture on withdrawal, so its tooling revision remains open. Existing-tray candidate is ready for the agreed representative comparison.

11分
ZA
ZaraChen1178

Keep that tooling work in its price, not in your operator's preparation allowance.

17分
JA
JackBaker0515

Representative comparison passed for the existing-tray route, including the agreed interruption response. Dedicated route still has no completed withdrawal revision; its observed preparation also removed most of the expected benefit.

5分
YA
YasminBarnes0528

Have you set a decision point with purchasing, Jack? The better-defined route needn't wait indefinitely for the other supplier to finish an unspecified revision.

17分
YA
YasminChan1050

Did purchasing choose, or is the comparison still waiting?

22分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .