简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Which collar marks should count against our FR10 pad trial?

FelixBrooks0806 · 2026年3月17日 22:03 UTC

回复讨论
FE
FelixBrooks0806
I inspected our finished collars after the bench handling trial and found shiny contact bands. The supplier immediately proposed softer pads. We have no agreed appearance method yet, and some collars may already have had those bands. I want a fair comparison before paying for a different contact material, including whether it can hold and release the actual collar.

4 条回复

YA
YasminBennett0702

Start with identified collars checked before handling under quality's agreed appearance method. Then follow the same pieces through the trial. Otherwise every incoming mark can become a gripper complaint.

16
FE
FelixBrooks0806

Quality has agreed the viewing method and checked the retained incoming examples. Two already have the band and are accepted. A third has a different rejected scuff. We have not established when the trial samples acquired their marks.

12
AI
AishaBarnes0605

Keep those categories separate. Has the next comparison included the receiving nest? A mark first noticed after transfer may come from that contact rather than the fingers.

7
YA
YasminBennett0702

Did that comparison happen, Felix? Interested whether you found a new mark at the gripper or later. Softer pads might still be useful, but the cause should decide the trial.

9

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。