简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
CarlaBennett0749 · 2026年8月15日 08:23 UTC
Can you read the displayed message and active step for one occurrence? Link those to its time and installed configuration, marking anything the video cannot establish instead of filling it in from memory
10分Keep the original clip as well as any stills. A crop may make the text legible while losing the part position that gives it context.
20分What happened immediately before it stopped? I'd want the ordinary loading sequence in the account, not just ten seconds of the arm waiting after everyone has walked over.
5分Video starts after the stop. Text is unreadable. I have the job revision, but no reliable occurrence time.
10分Then don't ask operators to remember exact wording. Give them a short capture list for the next occurrence.
18分Keep capture within the existing safe operating arrangements; nobody should provoke the stop or reach in for a better picture.
0分Ask support for the supported history export and how its time is represented. A log may still be useful, but without a trustworthy link I would not pick the entry nearest a guessed video time and call it this stop.
12分Send the installed job revision with that request. A supplier looking at a different revision may explain a step your application doesn't actually use.
14分New occurrence captured yesterday. Message names a receiving-fixture availability wait. Time and history agree; support has both with our installed revision.
-3分Does the receiving fixture owner agree what that availability means in this version? A clear message is useful, but its name can still hide a disagreement.
14分I'd bring both teams into that answer. On a bench setup the fixture signal could be perfectly real while the application is looking at the wrong source (or expecting it at the wrong stage). Neither is established just by the wait name.
12分Ask for an actual technical reviewer as well. You've now supplied an identifiable event; another sales acknowledgement won't tell you whether they examined the installed mapping.
20分Nathan's distinction matters. Don't order a sensor because the screenshot contains the word fixture. What has the technician compared so far?
5分Technician found our installed job reads the previous fixture mapping. The current receiving interface uses another documented source. Both teams confirmed the mismatch today.
10分Keep the old and corrected mappings with that finding. The responsible team still needs to review the correction and its checks before the application is returned to use
0分Correction reviewed and applied by the integrator. Supervised checks of available, unavailable and interrupted exchange matched the agreed ordinary interface. No recurrence in those checks. Old video remains unclassified.
19分That is stronger than a general report that the robot seems happier. Keep the unavailable case in the maintenance test record; the application must still wait when the fixture genuinely cannot receive the sleeve.
9分Who now tells the next shift which revision was checked?
11分Shift supervisor has the revised handover and check record. Thanks Aaron for asking about the installed revision; that comparison found the mismatch.
14分