简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
HanaCarter0970 · 2025年9月29日 09:52 UTC
Describe both runs and identify the trays. Was the replacement actually the same tray design, or just supplied under the same stock description?
9分Same stock description. The replacement has a folded lip underneath which the old tray does not. I only noticed it when we took underside photographs.
14分Compare where that lip sits relative to the locator before buying anything. Also check the intended tray supports. A photograph from above can make two quite different seats look equally convincing.
7分The lip touches the locator before the tray reaches its intended rear support. Toolmaker is checking the two tray drawings. I have left the replacement tray out of the claimed improvement.
19分Make the intended contacts explicit in the locator drawing, because locating a tray against whichever folded edge arrives first is going to be a pain to maintain
10分Can the toolmaker establish whether the lip difference is an approved revision or variation within one design? The remedy could differ. Two samples alone will not describe the supply range.
21分Do not throw away the good result either. I mean report the conditions it worked under, not claim that the whole idea failed because another tray found a weakness.
-9分Keep the failed tray in the next trial. It's the useful awkward one now, not something to hide so the locator looks decent
12分We had a locator which was fine until stores put labels over its contact face, so I now ask what people can add to a tray between issue and use (not just what the tray drawing says).
1分Chen, were those labels on the tray itself or on a removable holder? Trying to picture which bit your setup check needed to catch
12分Keep the results grouped by tray and setup. An overall success total can hide the fact that all the misses started with one change, which is the most useful part of your story.
9分Include the number of opportunities in each group too. Or rather, do not compare one miss after a change with a longer run before it as though the trial lengths were equal.
8分Kieran, the lip is an approved newer tray revision. Luis and LiamAli, the update separates the run lengths and misses by tray revision. Toolmaker is reviewing relief in the locator, with the intended supports unchanged.
9分Give the setter a way to recognise those tray revisions as well. The supplier's common stock description was not enough for you, so it won't become magically informative at the next changeover.
11分The locator relief is proposed, not made yet. We have also added visible tray identification to the setup review. Thanks, Rebecca, the underside comparison found a concrete problem without another pickup edit.
1分Caleb, labels were directly on the tray side where it met the stop; we agreed a different label area and made that contact visible in the setup check, no removable holder involved.
22分Please post the replacement-tray trial when the reviewed change is ready. Your current update can simply say improved with the original tray, incompatible contact found on the newer one.
7分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .