Which drawings would connect carton support with gripper access?

LucyArcher0393 · 2026年7月13日 08:02 UTC

回复讨论

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

LU
LucyArcher0393
Our plan for stacking packed cartons onto dispatch pallets with Fairino FR5 in a small finished-goods dispatch area has a very neat alternating layer drawing. But a packed rectangular product box has a preferred support direction, and some rotated cartons sit over gaps. I want packaging support and tool access reviewed together before I accept the pattern. Where should I start?

14 条回复

TH
TheoBrown0932

Does your layer drawing show the load-bearing carton edges and pallet deck beneath them? Add those, then overlay the complete gripper outline.

22分
LU
LucyArcher0393

We've only got top-view rectangles and a tool centre mark. The carton note specifies support direction, but the layer drawing doesn't show it

4分
TH
TheoBrown0932

Build that combined drawing for packaging and your integrator. Include a repeated, unrotated layer as a simpler candidate; it may suit the support direction better.

9分
CA
CarlaBrown0923

Don't let simpler sound like approved. An unrotated layer still needs its load and stability assessed with the actual contents.

-4分
TH
TheoBrown0932

Agreed; I meant a comparison option. Packaging must assess both arrangements with the specified cartons and contents, including support and stability.

20分
SO
SofiaAllen0282

Doesn't alternating the carton directions strengthen a stack, or is that assumption too general here?

15分
TH
TheoBrown0932

Too general. The arrangement changes where loads pass through the cartons. Your packaging reviewer needs the actual construction and support geometry to judge it.

7分
LU
LucyArcher0393

I've overlaid the layers and can identify carton edges positioned above gaps. I can now show packaging the actual support condition that concerned me

4分
JO
JoBennett0766

On my dispatch setup, the top view hid the pallet deck gaps completely. Adding the deck drawing changed which positions needed packaging review.

3分
LU
LucyArcher0393

Did you tie the pattern to a pallet specification? Ours just says pallet size, which now seems a bit thin

11分
JO
JoBennett0766

@LucyArcher0393 Include the deck geometry in the pattern's pallet reference. Matching overall dimensions don't establish identical support beneath the carton arrangement.

17分
TH
TheoBrown0932

@LucyArcher0393 Add the complete tool geometry and adjacent cartons at the corner positions. A tool-centre point alone can't establish whether the body or fingers overlap nearby packaging.

5分
LU
LucyArcher0393

@TheoBrown0932 I've got a useful review basis now: show support and the complete tool on the layer drawings, then have both specialists assess it. That answers my starting question; the pattern itself remains conditional on their findings

9分
TH
TheoBrown0932

That gives both reviewers the same concrete arrangement to assess. Pattern acceptance can then follow their findings.

20分

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 和 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。