简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
JonasBell0633 · 2025年9月4日 00:30 UTC
A full-size outline could expose an obvious clash, provided the tool supplier gives you the complete assembly and grip position. It won't replace their motion review, but it can make the missing space visible.
5分We have the gripper drawing but the fingers are still proposed. I have asked for the whole assembly outline with those assumptions marked.
9分Tell the stand supplier this is still an option study. Otherwise an estimated tool shape can become a very real invoice.
22分Done. Stand drawing is held. The tool supplier has supplied a provisional outline, including the blank at the proposed grip depth.
23分Include the door fittings in your measured opening. I mean the actual open-door geometry, not only the nominal width listed for the machine.
13分Could you ask the supplier to include another approach in the same study if the first one fails? I'd want to know whether the quote covers that comparison before every changed sketch becomes an extra.
12分They will compare a second approach within this study. Our outline already overlaps the handle on the proposed straight exit. That route is out, not the whole FR10 option.
20分Good distinction. Keep the actual failed outline with the request so the next sketch doesn't quietly put the handle back outside the problem.
8分Omar, measured open-door fittings are included. Jasper, the second approach review is agreed but not complete. The supplier is now adding the final finger geometry.
21分Thanks for reporting the scope answer. A priced comparison is much easier to manage than an unspecified promise to make it fit, especially while the fingers are still changing.
6分Will they show the full held-part movement for that second approach? An outline at the opening only covers one part of the route.
10分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .