简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
PavelAli0179 · 2025年11月6日 08:18 UTC
Can the intended operator tell which seat the cover has taken?
18分Compare the two positions with the same accepted and rejected covers before buying another light; that was the cheap first comparison I wanted for our trim-plate examples too.
18分Thomas, not reliably from the loading side. Sam, both retained covers are in the comparison. We are keeping the full frames and noting the seat rather than sorting images into scratch folders.
14分Good. Keep the old training pictures out of the acceptance set as well. We found those could survive long after the source folder was withdrawn.
13分Does either seat hide the known defect?
20分Yes, Jane. The rejected cover's faint scuff is much less visible in the second position. The accepted cover also looks less streaky there, which makes that view tempting for the wrong reason.
15分Then a cleaner accepted image cannot choose the seat for you.
22分Thomas, exactly, and Pavel already has the two physical judgements needed to explain why fewer bright bits is not automatically a better inspection image.
13分What is the holder designer proposing? Software cannot make an ambiguous physical seat stop being ambiguous.
14分A changed locating contact to make the unintended seat unavailable. It is a proposal, not a modified holder yet. We will repeat both covers and representative production pieces if that change is made.
17分Who will approve the changed contact for the finished surface?
10分Jane, useful point. Better location could still leave a new mark.
22分Quality and the tooling engineer will review it together, Jane, including surface condition before and after handling. Oliver, the old labelled training copies are withdrawn too.
2分Thanks for closing that training-copy gap. Is the relief operator included when the revised holder is evaluated?
16分Keep the seating comparison with the handover, Pavel, so the next person knows why the apparently prettier second view was not chosen.
8分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .