Can I retire this mysterious correction tab?

MayaAdams0127 · 2025年3月25日 11:43 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

MA
MayaAdams0127
I'm redesigning a gusseted-bracket fixture for an FR10 proposal. The old jig has a tab labelled correction, but released parts failed height checks. I want to understand it before giving the mystery a fresh drawing number.

12 条回复

PR
PriyaCarter1003

Find which measurement the tab was meant to correct, and whether that measurement was taken clamped or released. The word correction sounds reassuring, but it doesn't identify a target or establish that the change worked.

15分
MA
MayaAdams0127

The surviving note says it brought the upright against a checking pin while clamped. No released result is attached. I had assumed the tab was tied to final height.

16分
PR
PriyaCarter1003

Then treat that final-height connection as unproven. Also check which part revision the pin arrangement belonged to. Old shop aids sometimes outlive the drawing they were designed around.

24分
EM
EmmaAdams0115

We inherited a similar jig with several handwritten edits. A simple revision timeline helped us separate observed changes from explanations people supplied later. Could you put the tab note alongside the drawing and inspection revisions before deciding what to retain?

8分
PR
PriyaCarter1003

Include who supplied each explanation. An operator's recollection can be valuable, but it should remain identifiable as recollection rather than silently becoming a measured result.

11分
MA
MayaAdams0127

Timeline started. The tab note predates the current gusset revision. Our senior machinist remembers using it for fit-up, not inspecting finished height. I've written that as his recollection.

6分
PR
PriyaCarter1003

That makes copying it unchanged harder to justify. Have quality define final acceptance independently, then let the fixture review consider whether that old fit-up aid serves the new parts at all.

9分
TH
ThomasBrown0886

On a previous bracket review, aligning the fixture measurement to the drawing exposed a datum error; do not attribute the released height failures to welding distortion until the measurement conditions are established.

14分
HE
HenryAllen0264

We found mixed revisions in retained samples. Are yours individually identified?

18分
PR
PriyaCarter1003

Those are useful checks before any physical change. You might have a process problem and a records problem together; the history described so far cannot separate them.

14分
MA
MayaAdams0127

Only some samples are traceable, so quality is using those for the first review. The correction tab is excluded from the proposed design pending a defined purpose. Thanks, this has stopped me copying a label instead of a requirement.

-1分
PR
PriyaCarter1003

Let us know what the traceable samples show under the agreed measurement setup. That's the result that can move the fixture discussion beyond the old note.

22分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .