The new UR5e proposal uses the correct filled carton this time, but the revised tool layout has restored a turned position that leaves its bearing edge above a gap. I have asked packaging and tooling to reconcile that change before it enters the lesson or the trial quote.
Our UR5e dispatch-carton revision brings back a rejected turned position
GabrielBrown0888 · 2026年4月29日 20:08 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
9 条回复
Ask which lower-layer section the tool revision used. It is quite possible for both teams to have sensible drawings and still combine two versions that were never meant to go together.
7分That happened here. Tooling used the old lower layer when widening its withdrawal gap. Packaging's current section assumes a neighbour which is no longer there at that placement step.
16分Use the actual placement sequence in the joint review. Our filled carton made the bearing conflict obvious, but the final layer alone still hid when the supporting neighbour arrived.
18分And where an ordinary short order stops.
-4分Integrator has withdrawn the mixed drawing. The corrected sequence rejects the turned position for both the ordinary full order and the defined short ending. Straight rows remain a candidate.
5分Price the straight candidate as a complete dispatch job, including the extra pallet exchanges. Don't carry the turned pattern's higher count over simply because the same carton is being handled.
22分Who takes over a partial pallet after another order interrupts it?
21分Packing lead has assigned that to the covering packer and is reviewing identification and restart of the partial order with tooling. The trial scope includes the changed pallet total, but the partial-return arrangement is not agreed yet.
3分Did the covering packer try identifying a returned partial pallet, Gabriel? I would like to hear whether the proposed labels still make sense away from the designer's nice complete example.
19分