简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

our 48-housing total is counting inspections instead of accepted housings

OwenAli0225 · 2026年8月21日 00:51 UTC

回复讨论
OW
OwenAli0225
The UR5e dashboard makes my 48-housing batch look nearly complete after restart, but it counts repeated inspections. Some failures were followed by reviewed retries. How do I retain all those attempts and still show an honest current accepted-item total?

16 条回复

OM
OmarArcher0404

Group attempts by physical housing identity, then count current approved dispositions, not successful inspection events.

23
JO
JonasBell0633

We once had a report that counted the later pass correctly but hid the earlier failed attempt. Keep the attempts as history and derive the item disposition separately, with quality owning which reviewed result governs the current decision.

7
GA
GabrielArcher0366

Can all attempts be linked to a housing, including the ones recorded after restart?

15
IS
IsabelChan1083

Also check whether an accepted housing was later placed on hold. The most recent success is not necessarily the current disposition, especially when someone reviews an earlier result after the inspection itself.

13
OW
OwenAli0225

The housing labels survived restart. I have 44 attempt records for 40 housings, plus eight with no attempt recorded. The dashboard had been treating 44 as progress towards 48 accepted.

6
OM
OmarArcher0404

So even distinct inspected housings would be the wrong accepted total; quality still needs to reconcile those forty dispositions.

16
OW
OwenAli0225

Quality's first reconciliation is 35 accepted, three on hold and two rejected among the forty. Four repeated attempts remain in history; none creates another housing.

24
IS
IsabelChan1083

Keep the eight with no recorded attempt visible as their own group. That label says what the records establish; it does not by itself prove nobody inspected them or tell the shift to run them again.

19
GA
GabrielArcher0366

Does rebuilding the report from the saved records reproduce those same groups?

7
JO
JonasBell0633

Test a changed disposition too. A housing moving from accepted to hold should leave the accepted count even though its successful attempt stays visible, and reviewing a retry should not alter the batch membership.

19
OW
OwenAli0225

The revised report rebuilds 35 accepted from the saved records. A test moving one accepted housing to hold produces 34, with its pass still shown. Reopening the report keeps both the decision and its review trail.

15
OM
OmarArcher0404

Has quality confirmed the eight-record gap, or is that still a separate reconciliation job?

23
OW
OwenAli0225

The eight are confirmed awaiting inspection. Quality signed the current breakdown: 35 accepted, three held, two rejected, eight awaiting. All 48 accounted for; the batch itself is not finished.

9
GA
GabrielArcher0366

And a repeated delivery of an existing attempt leaves that count unchanged?

10
OW
OwenAli0225

Yes. Replaying an existing attempt and reopening twice changed neither totals nor dispositions. The reporting fault is fixed, and the remaining work lists are now separate from the attempt history.

13
IS
IsabelChan1083

Keep that distinction in the shift summary too. Thirty-five accepted is the useful output figure; forty-four attempts explains work performed, including retries, without pretending those retries produced additional parts.

9

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。