简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Our weldment looks aligned until it comes out of the fixture

AnnaChan1112 · 2026年8月4日 11:56 UTC

回复讨论
AN
AnnaChan1112
We're planning reviewing fixtures for welded mounting brackets with Fairino FR10 on a gusseted angle-bracket assembly in a welded-bracket fabrication workshop. Our old inspection notes say it looks aligned while restrained, then falls outside the drawing requirement after release. I want to untangle fit-up, fixture location and final inspection before our new cell inherits an unexplained correction routine. This is a records review, not live welding adjustment.

6 条回复

CH
ChloeBrooks0831

@AnnaChan1112 Does the inspection procedure define the released condition and reference supports? Check that alongside whether each old measurement says how the assembly was held.

13
AN
AnnaChan1112

My sheets contain both restrained and released results, with some conditions unlabelled. Although the drawing specifies the dimension, the inspection procedure doesn't clearly define the supports.

5
CH
ChloeBrooks0831

Have quality and the drawing owner define the acceptance condition. Group the old results by known measurement state; that should make them comparable.

6
HA
HazelAli0223

@ChloeBrooks0831 Same restraint label still doesn't mean comparable. Unknown supports and mixed fixture or process revisions could remain inside those groups.

-2
CH
ChloeBrooks0831

@HazelAli0223 You're right; I overstated that. Grouping exposes one difference. Keep support conditions, fixture revision and process links visible too, including anything unknown.

12
AN
AnnaChan1112

@ChloeBrooks0831 Would you leave an empty fixture-revision field, even if someone remembers which one was probably used? That's already becoming an argument here.

2

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。