each FR10 housing pickup nudge buys us less confidence

ClaraBarnes0524 · 2026年8月15日 08:30 UTC

回复讨论

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

CL
ClaraBarnes0524
Our polymer-housing transfer keeps getting another pickup tweak. The tray looks where it belongs, but the grip looks increasingly crooked. I want an inspection sequence before someone blames the FR10 or reteaches the lot... what evidence should survive that inspection?

2 条回复

NO
NoraChen1192

Preserve the program changes, then have maintenance compare the fitted contacts, their mountings and the source seating against the intended arrangement under the inspection procedure; include identified housings, since a tray that looks stationary says little about how they sit in it.

8分
CL
ClaraBarnes0524

I've retained the versions and stopped the casual nudges. Maintenance is taking the contact drawings and identified housings into the check. Nothing measured yet, so I'm withdrawing my earlier suggestion that the tray was definitely fine.

7分

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 和 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。