简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Our application keeps missing a brief PLC request - fixture inspection

ZaraArcher0395 · 2026年7月24日 14:56 UTC

回复讨论
ZA
ZaraArcher0395
I'm reviewing our non-safety job handshake for fixture inspection with Fairino FR10 in a training inspection cell with an ordinary job interface, using a sample housing. The PLC sends a brief request, and our application sometimes misses it. I can't find anything clear about who owns each signal or when it gets cleared. Safety functions are independently engineered; this is the ordinary job interface.

11 条回复

NA
NaomiAllen0332

Can you compare the request trace with your application's polls? Also note which side clears the request.

11
ZA
ZaraArcher0395

@NaomiAllen0332 I've compared the trace: the PLC raises and clears the request between consecutive application polls, with no observed acknowledgement before it clears.

9
NA
NaomiAllen0332

@ZaraArcher0395 Take an ownership table and a retained-request proposal to the interface owner. A request held until matching acknowledgement should settle the handshake in an offline review.

24
NA
NaomiBrown0941

Holding the request addresses the missed pulse, but it doesn't settle the interface. A retained request needs identity and restart rules to avoid being mistaken for new work.

1
NA
NaomiAllen0332

@NaomiBrown0941 Yes, I overstated that. Retention addresses the missed pulse. The offline review also needs matching identity, reset ownership and restart cases before the design is complete.

11
ZA
ZaraArcher0395

Should I record readers as well as the single writer? Our existing phrase used by PLC doesn't distinguish setting, reading or clearing a field.

21
NA
NaomiAllen0332

Yes: writer, readers, meaning, set condition and clear condition. Then give each legal transition a concrete example.

23
NA
NathanChen1156

On my interface, both sides cleared acknowledgement for different reasons. Each program looked reasonable alone. Put them together and the answer vanished.

18
ZA
ZaraArcher0395

I've checked our assignments and found that too: both sides can clear acknowledgement. I'll put both conditions in the review rather than quietly choose one.

9
ZA
ZaraArcher0395

I can account for the unobserved request, but the interface ownership and wider transition behaviour still need resolving.

21
NA
NaomiAllen0332

The trace gives the review a concrete starting point. Keeping the overall handshake open is fair.

8

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。