简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
ChenBarnes0529 · 2025年10月22日 13:46 UTC
Start with that exact interruption. What was known about the tool, tray and fixture?
10分Keep the pocket number as a location reference, not your entire account of the transfer. The next person needs to see what remained uncertain.
5分Caleb, tray pocket was empty, but we didn't have reliable confirmation for the tool or fixture. That's the hole in my sequence. The counter had already marched on regardless.
6分Describe pickup requested, pickup confirmed, placement requested and placement confirmed separately, with an unknown case when the available evidence cannot establish where the block is.
-2分Luca, those labels need the evidence beside them. Otherwise Chen will have four attractive boxes and the same missing information.
12分And a named recovery contact. Unknown must not offer another automatic transfer.
8分Agreed Oliver, I meant states supported by the actual checks, not four extra counters, and the controls person needs to decide which observations can establish each one.
17分We sketched those states with the controls person and found we cannot distinguish two of them with what we currently capture. Useful, if slightly embarrassing. Unknown now has a proper place in the draft instead of being treated as next pocket.
7分That is worth finding on paper. Has the draft also covered a tray being replaced while the interrupted transfer is being dealt with?
-2分Not yet, Oliver. I was still picturing the same tray sitting there politely. Added tray identity to the discussion; no automatic restart until the recovery design is reviewed and checked.
5分Will the person recovering it see which tray the interrupted attempt belonged to?
6分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .