简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Getting consistent inspection evidence before commissioning (checking cosmetic metal surfaces with a fixed camera)

RobinAdams0164 · 2026年8月6日 18:50 UTC

回复讨论
RO
RobinAdams0164
Our planned checking cosmetic metal surfaces with a fixed camera in a robot-presented camera station has Universal Robots UR5e presenting a brushed stainless trim plate to a fixed camera. The example images contain bright streaks that shift with small presentation differences, yet those streaks are being labelled as scratches. Before commissioning, I'd like to establish reliable references and image conditions for threshold tuning.

5 条回复

HE
HenryArcher0351

Check whether the suspected scratches were confirmed on physical samples under the agreed appearance procedure. Link each image to its sample identity and inspection result first.

22
RO
RobinAdams0164

I've found that some labels were assigned from the images themselves. The samples are still available, but those labels have no corresponding physical inspection results, making the reference circular.

4
HE
HenryArcher0351

Keep the image-only labels uncertain pending physical inspection. A controlled comparison of lighting and presentation can then investigate whether the moving streaks indicate reflection effects.

17
RO
RobinAdams0164

I've settled the review method: physical reference checks plus controlled image comparisons. That answers where to start; whether our inspection concept is suitable still depends on the resulting evaluation.

3
HE
HenryArcher0351

That gives the evaluation a sound question to answer. Suitability remains dependent on those checks, as you've made clear.

24

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。