简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Our UR5e acknowledgement sits between two reused coupon-job labels

NathanBennett0721 · 2026年6月30日 05:38 UTC

回复讨论
NA
NathanBennett0721
I cannot assign this acknowledgement to an inspection attempt. Python restarted and reused the label, while its timestamps disagree with the PLC and controller. We have a timeout in the record, but not a defensible combined sequence. What can I reconstruct without pretending the closest timestamp proves ownership?

1 条回复

HA
HassanBennett0704

Keep each source's original order and clock information, then look for shared event or attempt identifiers and independently established anchors. If those cannot distinguish the two attempts, retain both possible histories and the unassigned acknowledgement. The physical coupon's review owner needs that uncertainty, not a convenient guessed timeline.

20

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。