简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
CalebBaker0493 · 2025年10月8日 20:56 UTC
Were those exact bezels inspected before gripping? I'd want to know which marks are new before the supplier sells you a softer answer to damage from the delivery tray.
11分Only after pictures. One bezel has a line outside the pad contact area too, so no, I can't account for all the marks
8分Can you see the suspected pad mark under the same light every time, or does turning the bezel change what people call a mark?
8分And what does quality actually reject? A visible mark may still be within the appearance requirement.
4分Oscar, agreed. Caleb, use an agreed viewing and cleaning method on identified untouched and handled samples. Otherwise we're going to compare everyone's favourite lamp rather than the pads.
15分Luca, the bright line changes with the viewing angle. Oscar, quality hasn't judged this set. I've asked for that before the next pad sample arrives
2分Will the eventual appearance instruction say which surface and viewing position? I mean enough for a second shift to repeat it, not simply inspect for marks.
17分CalebBrown, yes. The next person should not have to recreate the inspector's desk lamp arrangement.
12分The holding comparison still needs doing too, because a pad that leaves a nicer surface but lets the bezel shift is not much of a bargain
5分Quality accepted the wandering line but rejected a small contact scuff on another bezel. We now have a reference for each. No softer-pad result yet, and holding and release remain in the comparison
10分Keep the accepted reflective example in the set. Easy to tune the appearance check until that harmless line disappears and accidentally hide the real scuff as well.
15分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .