简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

our fr10 nest is identified until somebody swaps its insert

OmarArcher0404 · 2026年1月26日 01:15 UTC

已关闭
OM
OmarArcher0404
The proposed FR10 recipe check reads the carrier label. Two similar housing inserts fit that carrier, including backwards. How should the review catch what is actually fitted instead of trusting the outer label?

6 条回复

LU
LucaCarter0961

Put both physical inserts in front of tooling and controls before buying a reader. Show wrong family and reversal as separate cases, then ask what will identify the fitted insert and orientation for the selected recipe.

18
OM
OmarArcher0404

We tried the combinations in the tooling review. Wrong family seats, reversed correct family also seats. The proposed scan of the carrier would accept all three arrangements.

12
NO
NoahBarnes0542

Then the proposed scan is identifying the wrong object. I'd settle the mechanical options with the designer and define the fitted-state checks with controls, including removal after an earlier successful check. You can write the cases now without pretending a barcode reader has solved them.

7
OM
OmarArcher0404

Designer is comparing keying options. Controls has the removal and restart cases, plus unreadable identity. No hardware selected from the carrier-label proposal.

23
LU
LucaCarter0961

Thanks for trying the actual combinations. Will the eventual operator check include a wrong insert beside the correctly labelled carrier, without the designer telling them which one you've fitted?

6
NO
NoahBarnes0542

And who keeps the recipe association current when an insert revision changes? Family name alone may stay the same while the locating arrangement changes underneath it.

-4

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .