We're planning planning repeatable welding of bracket assemblies with Universal Robots UR5e on a gusseted angle-bracket assembly in a precision fabrication quality department. Our old inspection notes say it looks aligned while restrained, then falls outside the drawing requirement after release. I want to untangle fit-up, fixture location and final inspection before our new cell inherits an unexplained correction routine.
This is a records review, not live welding adjustment.
Separating fit-up, restraint and final inspection (Universal Robots UR5e)
CalebCarter1015 · 2026年3月27日 12:42 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
5 条回复
Does the inspection procedure define the released condition and reference supports? Check that alongside whether each old measurement says how the assembly was held.
18分回复 LiamBell0664
My sheets contain both restrained and released results, with some conditions unlabelled. Although the drawing specifies the dimension, the inspection procedure doesn't clearly define the supports.
18分@CalebCarter1015 Have quality and the drawing owner define the acceptance condition. Group the old results by known measurement state; that should make them comparable.
12分回复 LiamBell0664
My review approach is settled: establish the acceptance condition and use measurements with identifiable conditions. I can take that forward while leaving fixture and process changes dependent on specialist assessment.
18分That gives the specialists an interpretable basis for review. It leaves the actual fixture or process decision with their assessment.
10分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .