简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
AnilAli0201 · 2025年11月30日 14:00 UTC
Keep the identified parts and full source images, with their capture conditions. Exclude unsupported scratch labels from tuning, but retain their history so the next person can see why the working set changed.
15分Originals retained. The working folder now separates confirmed surface marks from unverified image labels.
0分Does the faint rejected bezel appear in the new comparison too, or only the easier-to-see marks?
13分It is included. Not the same part from the FR10 work; quality identified this one separately.
8分Then compare its repeat presentations alongside an accepted difficult surface, keeping the part identities attached to every capture. A set of obvious scratches alone will give you a very comfortable but incomplete answer.
9分Can the next loader tell when the bezel is seated correctly? I do not know your holder, but a small unnoticed tilt could keep making new-looking examples.
9分Omar, worth checking before they tidy the folder again; the loader needs something more concrete than make it look like this photograph.
24分One locating edge is hard to see. Tooling is reviewing that with the loader; tuning remains paused.
6分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .