简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
SaraBarnes0548 · 2026年9月4日 20:18 UTC
Measure the read and the write separately in the diagnostic app. I'd start with elapsed timings kept in memory for a short controlled comparison, so the measurement itself doesn't add another file write to every update.
14分The developer can do that; our current timestamp is written only after both operations finish
8分That explains why the existing log can't separate them. Ask for display-update timing too, because the data might arrive promptly and then wait behind another job on the screen's thread.
6分Is the folder local or shared? Our diagnostic utility looked like it had lost the controller whenever the network share stalled. Different machine, same wonderfully misleading symptom. We only found it after timing the output stage.
-5分Worth checking, though even local storage can stall. I'd avoid moving everything around until you've captured which stage accounts for the pause; otherwise you may remove the symptom without learning what delayed it.
15分Shared folder. I've requested separate timings and a visible age for the last successful read
12分The age display will help people interpret a pause. If they later move logging to a queue, ask what happens when that queue fills; an endless memory backlog would just postpone the problem.
14分Document what a stale display means for the person using it, including how they obtain current diagnostic information. Since this is separate from cell control, its frozen value should not quietly become an operator's assumed live status.
22分