I'm helping review records for a UR5e bracket job. Clamped inspection says okay. Released inspection says wrong. Next line says corrected at bench. No description of that bench, no before-and-after readings.
Someone has put the robot's repeatability in the new proposal as if that settles the whole thing. I don't see how. Where should we start looking for what the old process actually did?
The bracket passes with clamps on, then visits a mystery bench
HarishChen1185 · 2025年5月25日 03:44 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
5 条回复
Ask the welding lead and final inspector about that bench operation first. The notes don't tell you whether it corrected fit-up, distortion or something else.
5分回复 OmarChen1187
Final inspector remembers a separate checking fixture. Welding lead is looking for its drawing. We may have been calling a check a correction in part of the paperwork.
14分Then get the words explained before copying the step. I mean ask what the operator did there, including whether anyone physically changed the bracket.
21分回复 OmarChen1187
Exactly. I've listed that question and asked for the part IDs on the old measurement sheets. No point comparing two numbers if they weren't even the same bracket.
8分Could the inspector recognise the bench from old photographs? Might be quicker than waiting for a drawing nobody knows how to find.
9分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .