The spacer pickup looked more consistent after I added the tray locator in our supervised FR10 trials, but a miss followed tray replacement. I want both observations in the update, without converting a few runs into a reliability claim. What should the tray-change limitation actually say?
Describe the observed improvement and the later miss separately, with the actual trays, locator setup and supervised scope. Identify what was observed after replacement without claiming it caused the miss. A comparison of seating and tray references can then investigate that difference.
I've updated it to say pickup appeared more consistent in the small supervised trial, then missed after the identified replacement tray was fitted. Tooling is comparing how both trays locate. I have not called the replacement wrong or claimed the locator is a finished fix.