Both remain in stock. Same outside label, different internal supports. Packaging wants separate construction references before approving either turned-row section.

Our filled carton exposed a support conflict that the outside outline hid too. I would put both actual samples in the joint review, especially if someone is tempted to reuse the first section with a new label.

Who identifies the construction when a partly used case batch returns to packing? A supplier list may be clear while the returned stock still looks identical.

Amara, did packaging and tooling settle either construction? I would be wary of treating a proposed stock separation as an implemented changeover just because the drawings have different names now.

Sarah's returned-stock question is awkward in a useful way. I'd ask the packer to identify an actual return, not only a new box beside its delivery label.