More FR10 puck offsets without a physical explanation

NaomiAdams0158 · 2026年6月28日 20:42 UTC

回复讨论

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

NA
NaomiAdams0158
Our puck-loading grip is losing squareness despite repeated point edits; I want the tray and tool condition compared before another correction, and a good grip on one tray will not establish that all our presentation is sound.

18 条回复

JU
JuliaBrooks0848

Start with one identified puck placed repeatedly in each tray before pickup. Same part, same intended seat. Then compare the jaws against their specified condition. Cheap checks, and no need to turn every difference into robot drift.

21分
NA
NaomiAdams0158

The same puck sits at different heights in two trays; within each tray it repeats, and maintenance found no visible jaw damage, though the tool check is not complete.

18分
AM
AmaraCarter1035

Which height reference did you use, Naomi? A measurement from two different tray rims could make a stable seat look different when the actual pickup reference is unchanged.

24分
NA
NaomiAdams0158

Both measurements used the same fixture reference beneath the tray, not its rim; the technician also confirmed the two trays seat fully against the intended locators.

10分
RA
RaviAbbott0041

Are both trays supposed to be the same revision? I would put their identifiers beside those readings before anyone changes a point to split the difference.

13分
RA
RaviAdams0128

And who decides what to run while the difference is investigated? If the next shift swaps trays without knowing why one is held, your careful comparison becomes another intermittent story.

4分
NA
NaomiAdams0158

Ravi Abbott, both were labelled as the current revision. Ravi Adams, the line lead has them held and identified; no further trial adjustments while maintenance checks the inserts against the tooling record.

9分
JU
JuliaBrooks0848

Labels don't make the inserts match. I've had an old spare put into a new body because the fixings lined up. Check the actual supporting pieces, not only the tray's outside plate.

11分
NA
NaomiAdams0158

That is what happened here: an older-height insert set in one current-labelled tray. Stores found the old reference on the underside. The other tray matches the specified set.

18分
AM
AmaraCarter1035

Then the next comparison should use the specified inserts and an explicitly reviewed program version, not whichever compensated point happens to suit the old set.

21分
RA
RaviAdams0128

Stores needs the obsolete reference separated from usable replacements too; otherwise maintenance can restore this tray correctly and the next shortage can quietly rebuild the same fault.

13分
RA
RaviAbbott0041

Thanks for checking the undersides, Naomi. Are the old inserts now out of the available-spares list?

10分
NA
NaomiAdams0158

Yes, Ravi Abbott, old inserts quarantined and stores records corrected; specified inserts are fitted, and the controls technician has selected the documented setup for the supervised two-tray check.

21分
JU
JuliaBrooks0848

How did that comparison behave? Interested in the second tray, not just the first nice pickup.

2分
NA
NaomiAdams0158

Both identified trays gave square grips through repeated reloads in the completed check; maintenance and controls have released that tooling and program combination together, rather than preserving the compensating offsets.

7分
AM
AmaraCarter1035

Did anyone inspect the remaining spare trays for the same mixed inserts? You've explained these two, but stores finding one old set makes that a worthwhile question.

11分
NA
NaomiAdams0158

They checked the remaining spare and found the specified inserts; its identity is recorded separately and it is not being called production-tested, while the two checked working trays are back in use.

11分
RA
RaviAdams0128

That is a workable handover: which trays were checked, which spare was inspected, and who owns any future replacement. Keep those different statuses visible when the next tray change is booked.

15分

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 和 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。