I'm reviewing our planned loading individual sheet panels into a locating tray with Universal Robots UR5e and a thin coated steel panel in a thin-sheet assembly workshop. The proposed vacuum tool has a bench report confirming a seal, but the panels come from a stack.
My remaining questions concern support during handling and confirmation that only one panel is delivered.
Universal Robots UR5e: What evidence belongs beside the vacuum reading?
AdaBennett0738 · 2026年6月8日 09:39 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
8 条回复
Was the report based on a full panel in the actual stack condition? Check sample size, support and film details against your incoming specification.
19分回复 TheoAli0236
@TheoAli0236 My report describes a supported flat sample, without an assessment of the complete panel geometry. It also leaves the represented protective-film condition unspecified.
5分Send the panel drawing and stack specification to your tooling specialist. Ask for distributed support and a separate single-panel confirmation proposal.
14分回复 TheoAli0236
@TheoAli0236 I'm picturing additional cups spread across the panel. Is that what you mean by distributed support, or am I oversimplifying it?
7分Spreading contact can reduce unsupported spans, so it's a reasonable layout to compare. Your drawing should show the edges that need controlled placement.
6分回复 TheoAli0236
That still risks sounding like more cups equals less trouble. Cup position and local flexibility matter, and none of it establishes one layer.
6分Fair correction. I mean a layout assessed against your panel's flexibility, not a cup-count target. Layer confirmation remains its own requirement.
19分回复 TheoAli0236
@TheoAli0236 Why can't good vacuum mean one panel? Wouldn't two make the reading different?
20分