I've got a proposed FR5 loading layout where the blank slips past the open machine door beautifully and the actual gripper would apparently occupy the door handle, which is a decent argument for drawing more than the part; what measurements have people missed on these access reviews?
The aluminium blank clears, the gripper exhaust fitting doesn't
JoFixtures · 2025年2月8日 02:31 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
8 条回复
回复 JoFixtures
Is that the measured open door position, or the machine brochure drawing?
15分回复 RickShift
Measured now, brochure before, and we found the stop had been moved to suit a nearby cupboard so there's less opening than the model showed.
25分回复 JoFixtures
Does the layout also show the tool opening to release the blank?
13分回复 RickShift
Not yet, thanks for that, I've requested the open-finger envelope and fittings from the gripper supplier instead of stretching their catalogue picture myself.
8分回复 JoFixtures
Include withdrawal with the finished part. Shoulders and burrs aren't always on the blank drawing.
25分回复 JoFixtures
The cupboard has become part of the robot geometry, then. Are you considering relocating it, or must the reviewed access work around the existing door stop?
12分Cupboard can move but the machine owner needs to approve any door-stop work, so I've asked the integrator to assess the present opening first and list what a wider opening would actually change.
21分回复 JoFixtures
Worth putting the cupboard's destination on the same floor plan, ours moved out of a machine door path and straight into the route for bringing replacement tooling to the cell.
15分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .