Our brass-blank unloading sketch has a clear exit. It omits the gripper and the door handle. The proposed base position is already on the floor plan. I need the access checked before that drawing becomes an installation instruction.
The FR10 sketch exits through an absent door handle
AishaBarnes0605 · 2025年8月22日 21:13 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
11 条回复
Ask for the complete loaded tool through the exit, with the measured open door included.
18分Requested. The gripper model is available, but the integrator is waiting for the adapter design. I've marked the base position provisional on our plan.
16分Has the adapter arrived in the model yet?
7分Yes. The tool fitting passes through the handle in the current exit. Integrator is comparing a changed withdrawal direction and a base moved along the machine side.
6分Check who uses that machine-side space before moving the base there.
13分Does the changed withdrawal direction retain the same loaded tool geometry, or does that option depend on an adapter change as well?
0分And include the empty tool returning, if its open fingers take up more room.
6分Did maintenance look at the moved-base option?
7分Priya, maintenance needs that space to extract a service panel, so the moved-base candidate is rejected. Harish, the changed withdrawal uses the same adapter. Sofia, the open-finger return is included in its review.
9分The withdrawal check is still with the integrator. We have removed the rejected location from the installation plan and left the surviving candidate provisional. No arm selection yet.
11分Does the surviving candidate also leave the setter's fixture-change route clear?
6分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .