简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

my fr5 review forgot who prepared the puck transfer

JaneAdams0162 · 2026年6月18日 18:40 UTC

回复讨论
JA
JaneAdams0162
Enjoyed the supervised FR5 puck-transfer trial. My write-up makes it sound as though I prepared the job, which I did not. How much of the demonstrator's help should I spell out?

7 条回复

MI
MinaChan1120

I would describe the handover point. What was ready when you took over? Then say which actions were yours and which needed help. That is more useful to me than a general word like supervised.

14
JA
JaneAdams0162

Fixture mounted, pucks laid out, job loaded. I followed the sequence and used the displayed controls. The demonstrator talked me through a stopped transfer; I did not diagnose it

24
MI
MinaChan1120

That gives me a clear boundary. I would still like to know what you enjoyed. Was it the controls, the explanation, or seeing the transfer work? Preparation by somebody else does not erase your experience.

23
JA
JaneAdams0162

The prompts were easy to follow, and I could see what stage I was at. Or rather, I could during normal transfers. At the stop, the explanation came from the demonstrator

8
MI
MinaChan1120

Keep that distinction in the review. I would not infer independent recovery from clear normal prompts. Readers considering training need both parts of your account.

10
JA
JaneAdams0162

Edited. Named the prepared fixture and loaded job, kept my positive view of the prompts, and described the guided stop. Thanks Mina; the handover point made this much easier to explain

15
MI
MinaChan1120

That answers what I wanted to know. Your first impression can remain positive without making the preparation disappear. I would read that as a trial account, not a promise about my own setup time.

9

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。