BenBench · 2026年3月3日 09:26 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
Say that. It's clearer than the review claim.
13分The missing accessory was a demonstrator, apparently.
13分You can correct who prepared it without throwing out what you observed. Did loading the blocks get easier during the session? That might be worth describing on its own.
19分And asking which tray isn't a failing. Someone had to explain their arrangement. I'd rather teach that than discover people were guessing politely.
16分Ada, yes. I stopped second-guessing the block orientation after a couple of loads. Still needed the demonstrator when I wasn't sure the tray was finished.
25分What did finished mean there, Ben? All the intended pockets filled, or the exercise reporting completion? They might look the same in an uninterrupted demonstration.
16分Did the demonstrator's explanation help you tell those apart?
10分Nathan's question could make a useful sentence in the review, not a whole new investigation.
4分Who is the review for? Another beginner choosing a workshop needs different detail from someone buying a production cell.
21分Other beginners, Amara. Nathan and Aaron, I was counting filled pockets; the demonstrator showed me the exercise's completion indication. I hadn't noticed it. That's going in.
1分Better than 'intuitive', which usually means somebody explained it while the writer wasn't taking notes.
21分Thomas, sometimes it really is easy to follow once you're shown. We don't need to make every positive word suspicious. Ben just needs to say what he was shown.
2分Fair. I was having a go at the vague word, not the lesson.
17分Review changed. It now says I used a prepared exercise, learned the block orientation, and needed help reading the finish. Still says I enjoyed it. Because I did.
7分Thanks for keeping the tray example. I find that much more useful than a score for how easy the robot felt.
9分Did you change the photo caption too?
7分Yep. 'My setup' was pushing it.
23分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .