Visible cylinder, contact marks, no agreed inspection method (transferring finished cylindrical parts into trays)

MeiBaker0516 · 2026年8月7日 21:19 UTC

回复讨论

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

ME
MeiBaker0516
Our gripper selection for Universal Robots UR5e handling an anodised aluminium sleeve during transferring finished cylindrical parts into trays in a finished-parts handling station needs a clearer comparison. Bench samples show marks on the visible cylindrical finish, and the supplier has proposed softer pads. Since we haven't agreed an appearance method, I'd like to establish one alongside an assessment of holding and release.

9 条回复

PA
PavelAdams0092

Does the customer have an appearance inspection method? Get that and the cosmetic zones on the drawing beside the samples before comparing pad materials

23分
ME
MeiBaker0516

The exterior cylinder is labelled visible on the drawing. We've only got phone photos in workshop lighting, with no link to the customer's viewing procedure.

8分
PA
PavelAdams0092

Request that procedure and compare handled samples with untouched references under it. A softer pad is worth including as a candidate to reduce marking

18分
MI
MiaBaker0470

@PavelAdams0092 Softer pads can hold grit and drag on release. Your suggestion could sound like material softness is the main thing to optimise

-8分
PA
PavelAdams0092

You're right about the emphasis. The comparison needs contact geometry, representative contamination and release behaviour too. A softer pad doesn't get a presumed advantage

9分
ME
MeiBaker0516

@PavelAdams0092 Would a marked sample and an untouched one from the same batch be enough to avoid blaming the gripper for incoming scratches?

0分
IS
IsabelAli0213

@MeiBaker0516 It's useful, but take a before-contact photo of each handled sample as well. Two pieces from the same batch needn't have identical incoming marks.

9分
ME
MeiBaker0516

@IsabelAli0213 I can frame the appearance comparison properly, though the samples don't yet support a contact choice. The review still needs to cover retention and release as well as finish.

6分
PA
PavelAdams0092

That makes sense. A clearer finish comparison is progress, while retention and release remain part of the same selection decision

11分

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 和 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。