简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
ElliotAdams0161 · 2026年7月27日 17:50 UTC
Show the open tool at withdrawal, not just the box footprint. Adjacent cartons take space too.
23分Our empty-pallet demonstration missed exactly that neighbouring-carton problem, so I'd ask for the placement order on the same drawing rather than have two teams imagine different stages.
20分Give every position an identity and mark which are unsupported in the rotated layer. Packaging can answer for those loaded cases; tooling can answer for entry and exit at that stage. Someone still needs to own the combined decision if their proposed changes conflict.
25分Packing wants the count kept. Tooling hasn't seen the support-direction note. I'll send one marked layout.
1分Keeping the count is a preference, not a support finding. I would ask packing which alternatives they can tolerate before tooling spends time refining a pattern packaging may reject.
18分Agreed, but don't assume fewer cartons cures unsupported edges. Check the new arrangement as well.
7分Could packing name its actual constraint, like a dispatch requirement, so the alternative isn't judged only by whether it looks less full?
7分They want the existing dispatch count. No alternative agreed. Joint drawing now includes withdrawal and support direction.
19分Then the meeting has a real decision to make. Ask packaging to identify which gap cases it can assess and what evidence is missing, and ask tooling to mark conflicts rather than silently move cartons to solve them.
2分Has anyone assessed the packed box itself yet, or are all the new markings still review inputs?
12分Inputs only. Thanks for checking; my note to packing will say the pattern is still unaccepted.
23分