简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

FR5 sleeve transfer loses its place between release and save

LeoCarter0971 · 2025年11月13日 02:33 UTC

已关闭
LE
LeoCarter0971
Our FR5 test releases a sleeve into the fixture, then saves the next tray pocket. A stop between those actions leaves the old pocket selected. I know from our monitor tests that reconnect and a full application restart need separate checks; what physical state should the recovery retain here?

12 条回复

JO
JonasChan1068

Is release sent being treated as sleeve received?

4
AN
AnnaCarter1025

Keep the interrupted attempt tied to its tray, source pocket and destination, with the available confirmation for each stage. What did you actually observe in the fixture when this happened?

6
LE
LeoCarter0971

Jonas, yes, the program treats the release command as completion. Anna, the sleeve was in the fixture on this occurrence, but that was found during checking, not confirmed to the program.

6
LE
LeoChan1058

That observation can settle this particular recovery without establishing a general rule that release sent means placed. Controls needs to define the receiving evidence and the uncertain case separately.

21
FE
FelixAllen0284

Give the operator that distinction in ordinary words too. Otherwise the screen says incomplete while the fixture visibly contains a sleeve, and someone will decide the screen is simply wrong.

19
JO
JonasChan1068

Felix, should they see the saved pocket and the interrupted destination together?

-7
FE
FelixAllen0284

Yes, Jonas, with their identities. I would not make them remember which fixture the old pocket was feeding while reading an unexplained pending label.

11
AN
AnnaCarter1025

Leo Carter, does the draft also handle a fixture being cleared while the job is held? That changes what a later operator sees without necessarily changing the saved attempt.

18
LE
LeoCarter0971

Not in the old sequence. We have added it to the recovery review along with the receiving confirmation and a restart during recovery. Unknown attempts remain held instead of returning to the normal tray loop.

20
LE
LeoChan1058

Has the controls owner agreed those states, Leo Carter, or are they still proposals? The physical checking route needs an owner as well as a software label.

4
JO
JonasChan1068

And who advances the pocket after reconciliation?

5
LE
LeoCarter0971

States agreed in the draft, Leo Chan, with the shift technician handling reconciliation through the reviewed recovery. Jonas, controls owns the explicit advance after that decision. Offline cases are written but not yet passed.

12

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .