I have separated the checking-fixture identities in our FR10 bracket baseline. Another entry still troubles me: its restrained alignment tick refers to the outside leg face, while the released failure is a hole-position result. The summary calls the difference movement after release, but those observations do not measure the same thing.
The restrained bracket check measures a different feature
AdaAdams0129 · 2026年3月11日 16:17 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
8 条回复
回复 AdaAdams0129
Remove the claimed movement. Keep both observations under their actual features.
5分Done. Quality confirmed that the restrained tick was a setup check only. The released hole-position reading remains a genuine failure against the applicable drawing.
3分回复 AdaAdams0129
That preserves the useful failure without inventing a measured change. Does the same bracket have a correction and reinspection record?
11分It has a final accepted hole-position result and a fabrication correction entry. The identity stays linked throughout. Correction duration is missing.
9分回复 AdaAdams0129
Then you know the route, not its labour allowance.
10分We followed a current selected group with the process specialist. Their first released checks were recorded before correction, and the observer separated hands-on work from waiting. The estimator is using that observed group, not the old tick, for the provisional allowance.
21分回复 AdaAdams0129
Keep the sample size and selection with that allowance.
6分回复 AdaAdams0129
Did the observed group include first-time passes as well as brackets needing correction? That matters when the estimate is spread across an ordinary batch.
16分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .