the fr5 exchange picture still has no open door

Machine owner can supply that. The integrator has a tool model, although it shows the fingers in one position only.

They need the relevant loaded and open states. Our own layout review also needed the empty return, which had been quietly assumed clear.

Yes, Sofia. I've added fixture removal to the tasks the integrator must show, alongside the empty return Omar mentioned.

Reece's point belongs on the layout now. It's cheaper to reject a proposed position before someone prices anchors and cable routes for it.

Reece, was your cabinet access problem visible on the original plan?

The combined model shows our first approach crossing the opened door handle. Integrator is trying a different stand position; maintenance has marked its required access area on that version.

Omar, the cabinet was drawn, but not its open door or the space needed to work there. Nobody had asked maintenance to mark the task area. They did notice before installation, luckily.

Owen, is fixture removal still included after that move?

Included, but the setter rejected the new position because it crosses the fixture trolley route. We're comparing a third position rather than calling the handle clearance a win.

Keep the rejected positions with their reasons. Otherwise the next drawing meeting can spend an hour rediscovering the one that nearly worked.

Has the third position survived the combined review? Curious which constraint finally sets the location.

The third position clears the modelled tool routes and leaves the trolley route usable. The maintenance area is preserved too. It needs a longer service route, which is now being priced.

Any assumed tool detail still missing?

The rear fitting and line route are identified, with both finger states included. The integrator has listed the geometry used and the remaining installation checks.

Then the access comparison has given you a usable candidate. Include the changed service cost before making the arm decision; it belongs to this layout, even if the arm quote is unchanged.

We have a revised total now. Purchasing kept this FR5 layout as the candidate for the next design stage, with the installation checks still explicit. Thanks, Reece, maintenance caught that constraint early enough to price it properly.