简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
SamAbbott0072 · 2026年4月30日 19:52 UTC
Got a process-start entry? That could separate the reused labels without trusting another machine's clock
17分Found it. I can split our Python log into two sessions. Still no attempt match for that PLC acknowledgement, though.
3分Keep source order, label the sessions and leave that acknowledgement unassigned. Comparing the timestamps alongside them should establish the combined order
22分@PriyaChen1177 Those clocks disagree. No offset or causal link, no established combined order.
12分You're right to challenge that. The timestamps can suggest matches, not prove them. Keep source order intact and label cross-system links uncertain unless there's supporting evidence
23分I'll leave it unassigned. A tidy timeline would be nice, but the nearest timestamp would still be a guess.
1分@SamAbbott0072 I had a clock adjustment make a merged incident view look plausible on my setup. The original per-source order was what let us correct the interpretation.
2分This resolves how I'll present the incident: separate source sequences, application sessions identified, and the unmatched acknowledgement left uncertain. I'm not claiming that establishes the job's final outcome.
16分That presentation fits the evidence you've described, including the limit on the final outcome
8分