The tray looks fixed, but the grip looks crooked - tray loading

PriyaAli0220 · 2026年3月28日 22:44 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

PR
PriyaAli0220
Our setup uses Fairino FR10 for tray loading with a small polymer housing in a supervised production bench. We've repeatedly adjusted pickup points as handling becomes unreliable. Although the tray appears unchanged, the grip no longer looks as square. I'd like an inspection sequence that helps us identify the cause before making further teaching changes or attributing it to the arm

18 条回复

AD
AdaAbbott0042

Does the angle change before contact or as the fingers close? Existing footage may help you locate where things start going wrong.

24分
PR
PriyaAli0220

In the footage, it sits consistently in the checked fixture and turns during gripping. So the crooked position isn't there at the start

10分
AD
AdaAbbott0042

@PriyaAli0220 Preserve the current settings and pause further nudges. Have maintenance inspect finger mounting, contact surfaces and tray seating under the proper isolation procedure, using that observation to guide the checks.

9分
PR
PriyaAli0220

I've checked the maintenance history and found a pad replacement preceding the initial pickup-point correction. That establishes a relevant sequence of changes to investigate

6分
AD
AdaAbbott0042

@PriyaAli0220 That sounds like the pad replacement caused it. Check the installation against the specified arrangement.

18分
VI
VictorBaker0446

The sequence makes pad installation worth investigating, but it doesn't establish causation. Fixture variation remains a possible contributor even with that maintenance history.

7分
AD
AdaAbbott0042

Agreed, I called it too early. Treat the replacement as a lead; verify installation and contact condition alongside tray location before assigning the cause.

19分
LO
LouisArcher0398

On my own setup, we found worn contact surfaces and inconsistent tray seating together. Fixing only the pickup point made the symptoms move around

10分
PR
PriyaAli0220

@LouisArcher0398 How did you keep those two effects apart? Ours already has enough point edits to make the history messy

17分
LO
LouisArcher0398

We kept a known reference configuration and had maintenance check one condition at a time. We didn't roll back points blindly after finding wear

2分
ZA
ZaraChen1178

@LouisArcher0398 Why not just go back to the original points once the gripper's checked? Aren't those the good ones?

11分
AD
AdaAbbott0042

Only if they match the verified setup. Tooling, frames or presentation may have changed; your responsible technician should compare the configuration before any supervised validation.

6分
PR
PriyaAli0220

The relationship between the initial points and the present setup hasn't been verified. I'm retaining the current configuration instead of assuming the original positions would restore a known condition

8分
VI
VictorBaker0446

Good. Also, 'tray looks the same' isn't a seating measurement. Your pre-contact observation helps, but it doesn't cover every tray replacement.

6分
PR
PriyaAli0220

The supervised comparison found seating variation as well as worn gripping surfaces. So we really do have more than one thing to investigate

8分
ZA
ZaraChen1178

Would you clean the pads or replace them? I can't tell where routine cleaning stops being enough

3分
AD
AdaAbbott0042

Use the tool maker's maintenance criteria and a qualified inspection. Appearance alone won't tell you whether cleaning restores an acceptable contact surface.

6分
LO
LouisArcher0398

i kept photos of my setup's contact surfaces with the maintenance notes. They helped explain what had changed without relying on 'it used to look better'

15分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .