Which UR5e export should replace our incomplete inspection screenshots?

Maintainer identified the installed revision. The export supplied has a different suffix. I have asked why.

We once had a handover export that was newer than the installed job, with a change nobody had commissioned. The newer name was not a reason to load it. Have the integrator explain the relationship and identify the actual installed package before your maintainer treats either file as the reference.

Can the maintainer open both for comparison without changing the installed job?

That comparison is useful if their tools support it. Chloe, ask the integrator for the revision relationship in writing as well; you should not need to reverse-engineer their naming system to find the handover reference.

The suffix marks an uncommissioned draft. Matching installed export requested. Both files remain separate; nothing loaded.

Good. Once the matching package arrives, use an actual bracket example to walk through the called check, ordinary PLC conditions and result ownership. An export can contain the missing routine while the handover still says nothing useful about why it waits or who resolves an undecided result.

Will the relief maintainer join that walkthrough?

Yes. Matching package arrived and opens. The unresolved-bracket example is included in the planned walkthrough.

Keep the draft clearly outside the released handover, then. Otherwise the next person may choose the higher-looking suffix and undo all this careful identification in one click.