One UR5e wait message, two possible receiving conditions

HazelAllen0310 · 2025年11月25日 17:22 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

HA
HazelAllen0310
I've paired our sleeve-loading clip with its program step and receiving tray identity. Support now asks whether the tray was ready. The PLC author tells me the waiting message can cover two missing conditions, but the display names neither. I can ask for the trace; I am less sure what the operator should be told in the meantime.

12 条回复

CH
ChenBell0616

Ask the author to name both conditions and what the current screen can actually establish. The operator shouldn't have to choose between hidden causes from a message that was written to cover both.

11分
HA
HazelAllen0310

One condition is tray seated; the other is permission from the next station. The message just says waiting for tray. Our operator has been rechecking the seat every time.

16分
RE
ReeceAli0210

That's wasted effort built into the wording. In our ticket the useful step was assigning the shift lead the matched occurrence and asking for the relevant confirmation history, instead of collecting more wide shots.

10分
MI
MiaAdams0122

Who owns changing that message and the related handover instruction, Hazel? The support trace can explain one event without improving what the next operator sees.

25分
CH
ChenBell0616

Reece, agreed on getting the trace. I wouldn't assume the seat checks were pointless on every stop though. We still don't know which condition was missing on Hazel's captured occurrence.

8分
RE
ReeceAli0210

Fair correction. I meant making the operator repeat the same check for two different possible causes. The recorded stop still needs its own answer.

1分
HA
HazelAllen0310

Mia, our local integrator owns the PLC message and the handover page. They've accepted that the wording needs reviewing. The trace for our occurrence is with them, not interpreted yet.

16分
CH
ChenBell0616

Keep the interim instruction honest about that uncertainty. It can say the held job needs the named support person when the displayed information doesn't establish the next step, without teaching the operator to guess which input is missing.

17分
MI
MiaAdams0122

Can the support person see both source conditions with the relevant timing, or do they only have the same combined message on another screen?

7分
HA
HazelAllen0310

They have a diagnostic view of both, but it shows current values only. The saved trace is what will tell us about the occurrence. I have made that distinction in the draft instruction.

11分
RE
ReeceAli0210

Thank you for spelling that out. A current green indication can otherwise get repeated in the ticket as though it was green when the job stopped.

15分
CH
ChenBell0616

When the integrator returns the explanation, ask them to walk the operator through that same example using the revised wording. That's where you'll find out whether it makes the two conditions understandable.

18分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .