FR5 inspection-package suffix with no seating-face comparison

LouisArcher0398 · 2026年4月26日 16:39 UTC

回复讨论

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

LO
LouisArcher0398
Our inspection-sample tooling stays unfitted. I've requested the delivered FR5 interface drawing, not another equivalence assurance. Three days waiting.

6 条回复

GR
GraceAllen0320

Give the supplier your confirmed drawing revision with the delivered label and seating-face photographs. Ask the fixture designer to compare the actual interface before deciding whether this package suits the tooling.

12分
LO
LouisArcher0398

Supplier drawing received. Designer found a raised rim missing from the confirmed version.

12分
AA
AaronCarter0958

What does that rim change for your bracket? It could matter a lot or be outside the contact area, and I wouldn't decide from a different suffix alone.

13分
LO
LouisArcher0398

It blocks full seating. Designer rejected the supplied interface. Purchasing requested the confirmed configuration.

16分
GR
GraceAllen0320

Has the supplier offered an identified replacement configuration? Ask for its drawing and a clear proposal for the delivered package too, so the next shipment does not repeat the same uncertainty.

8分
AA
AaronCarter0958

Louis, any answer on that proposal? The tooling can remain unfitted while purchasing sorts it out, but the person scheduling installation needs to know whether there is a real supply option yet.

13分

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 和 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。