The acceptable plate is still acceptable under quality's check. Its latest camera image has a bright band labelled scratch, and the band shifts when we reseat it. I am not the imaging specialist, but this seems a poor starting point for tuning anything. Who should settle the disagreement between the physical reference and the annotation?
Why has our acceptable UR5e trim plate acquired a scratch label?
ReeceAllen0297 · 2026年5月8日 19:50 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
4 条回复
Have quality and the imaging person look at that exact plate together. What does the arrow point to on the physical surface? Keep the unmarked image too; nobody needs to defend an arrow just because it was saved first.
18分Nothing corresponding to the band was found on the plate. Quality withdrew the scratch annotation. The imaging person wants a controlled presentation comparison before changing the light, which seems reasonable.
9分Did reseating explain the band change? I'm interested whether the holder itself lets the plate sit differently, rather than assuming the robot would reproduce the hand-held pictures.
11分Can your covering loader identify the intended seat without seeing the reference photograph?
8分