This connector job has a retained lead-in and a matched installed job and fixture record, so I can show support more than the stopped robot. The fixture-confirmed input drops briefly before the loading wait, while the request stays present. The phone view does not show any obvious fixture movement.
I have asked the package author what that confirmation physically detects before calling it a robot fault. What else would help maintenance distinguish a genuine change at the fixture from an unreliable indication?
Same recorder sequence, Emma Baker, with the drop preceding the wait; Jane, the author identifies the latch target, which the phone view hides behind the fixture body.
Could the video request show the latch area from a useful fixed view? I mean for observing normal operation, not asking someone to lean into the station to chase the target.
Nadia, I'd get maintenance's inspection first. A better video still won't show everything about the lead and mounting, and Nathan already has a repeatable input symptom.
Maintenance checked the target and mounting without finding looseness, but found damage at the sensor lead's strain relief; the circuit is being examined by the electrician before we treat that as the cause.
Our wait discussion changed once the expected input was properly named. Ask the electrician to keep the damaged lead identity with the finding, not only a note saying wiring repaired.
Mia, repeated drops aren't quite the same as reproducing the cause. Nathan has kept that distinction, which seems sensible while the circuit is being checked.
The electrician has identified the damaged lead and confirmed intermittent continuity in its assessment; our spare matches the specified lead, Nadia, and maintenance is reviewing the routing that put strain on it.
Maintenance owns the routing correction with the fixture supplier checking the arrangement, Jane; Emma Baker, yes, the requested history will be retained through the agreed complete loading checks, not just a static input check.
Replacement lead and revised routing are fitted, with the used spare removed from available stock and replenishment ordered; maintenance is completing the loading comparison with the same identified connector job.
Yes, the agreed repeated loading checks completed without the confirmation loss, and the stored traces match the expected sequence; support has closed this occurrence against the lead damage and routing correction, with the maintenance finding attached.