Which FR5 bezel comparison should come before threshold tuning?

AnilAli0201 · 2025年12月3日 00:59 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

AN
AnilAli0201
I've brought the faint-defect lesson from our FR10 work into this FR5 review: confirmed parts first, not prettier pictures. Here the bright streak changes when the bezel is reseated. Should I start with the holder comparison?

6 条回复

JA
JamieCarter0991

Is it touching the same locating faces in both views?

7分
AN
AnilAli0201

Cannot tell from the crops. Full frames requested; physical bezel IDs are known.

17分
MI
MiaBennett0731

My cover crops hid exactly that: two different stops touching the part. I kept staring at the stripe while the seating difference sat outside the picture. Get the holder designer to look at the full views with you.

20分
JA
JamieCarter0991

And don't label the moving streak harmless before the actual surface has been checked.

14分
AN
AnilAli0201

Surface checked. Accepted bezel and faint reject retained; full views show inconsistent seating at one stop.

21分
RE
RebeccaBell0691

Then include both identified bezels when the seating arrangement is reviewed and in the later lighting comparison, because a repeatable holder still has to give the camera a view of the real faint defect

13分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .