Our handover for part inspection with Fairino FR10 in a maintenance review of a commissioned inspection cell, using a reference plate, is mainly pendant screenshots. I'm trying to improve it while the original integrator is available. The pictures lack revision details and cover the main routine without its subprograms, fixture assumptions or expected ordinary PLC signals.
Start by identifying the installed program revision and its corresponding controlled export. Can you establish that link before describing the routine's dependencies?
Our installed revision matches a controlled export, but I've identified screenshots from an older program copy. Their different routine names explain the mismatch in our notes.
Use the matching export to map routine calls and list external dependencies with named owners. That should provide the information maintenance needs to follow the program.
You're right to limit my wording. The map supports understanding the program; recovery instructions must come from the responsible integrator's approved procedure, not from inferred call order.